cover

*第五季*【EP. 205】#580 經濟學人導讀 feat. 國際時事 feat. 新聞評論【以巴和美國 >>> 耶路撒冷何等重要?;世界氣象組織 >>> 氣候變遷導致自然災害;喀布爾淪陷 >>> 大意了?;巴西的原著民權利 feat. 土地所有權】

每日一經濟學人 LEON x The Economist
2021-09-08
35:51
0 comments
No Rating

❗⁠您的一杯咖啡錢 = 我們遠大的目標!捐款支持我們:https://pse.is/3jknpx 👍Andre 老師 - 英文檢定考班,等你/妳來報名:https://reurl.cc/dGMrDV 👍Chester 老師 - 英文文法與寫作班,等你/妳來報名:https://reurl.cc/Gmaxod 🔴Thursday September 2nd 2021 🔵2021年9月2日星期四 🌏Espresso - The world in brief 每日濃縮 - 世界概況 1️⃣Israel feat. the Biden administration: a different approach towards Palestine 以色列 feat. 拜登政府:在巴勒斯坦上有所分歧 Israel called America’s plan to re-open its consulate in Jerusalem to deal more closely with the Palestinians “a bad idea”. The office was subsumed into the new American embassy in Jerusalem when it was moved from Tel Aviv by Donald Trump’s administration in 2019… 以色列稱美國計劃重啟其在耶路撒冷 (Jerusalem) 的領事館以更密切地與巴勒斯坦打交道是“一個壞主意”。該辦公室於 2019年被前美國總統川普 (Donald Trump) 的政府從特拉維夫 (Tel Aviv,以色列第二大城,也是國際社會普遍承認的以色列首都) 遷出時被歸入新的美國駐耶路撒冷大使館… 2️⃣World Meteorological Organisation: climate change leads to natural disasters 世界氣象組織:氣候變遷導致自然災害 The number of disasters caused by climate change has increased fivefold over the past 50 years, according to the World Meteorological Organisation. In a report, the UN agency said that such weather-related events had caused about $3.64trn of damage and killed about 2m people… 根據世界氣象組織的數據,氣候變遷所造成的災害數量在過去五十年中增加了五倍。在一份報告中,該聯合國機構 (即世界氣象組織) 表示此類與氣候相關的事件已造成約 3.64兆美元的損失,並造成約兩百萬人死亡… 3️⃣Predicting the fall of Kabul: OPPS… 推斷喀布爾淪陷:大意了… Taliban fighters in the city of Kandahar, the group’s birthplace, paraded captured military equipment in the wake of America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. President Joe Biden has insisted the chaotic evacuation from Kabul airport was an “extraordinary success”… 在美國從阿富汗撤軍後,塔利班武裝份子在該組織的發源地坎大哈 (Kandahar) 展示繳獲的軍事裝備。美國總統拜登 (Joe Biden) 堅稱從喀布爾機場的混亂撤離是“非凡的成功”… 🔱Espresso - Today’s agenda 每日濃縮 - 今日頭條 💪💪💪⁠🇧🇷💪💪💪⁠A landmark ruling: indigenous rights in Brazil 極具里程碑的裁決:巴西的原著民權利 Today Brazil’s supreme court will resume its consideration of a case that will have repercussions for indigenous groups, farmers and others who contest ownership of the same lands. Up for debate is the controversial marco temporal or “time frame” thesis, which has been used to grant property rights to non-indigenous Brazilians. It dictates that indigenous territories are only guaranteed if they were occupied in 1988, when the constitution was ratified. Indigenous groups consider this idea an affront (they have lived in South America for centuries)… 巴西最高法院在今天將恢復審判一宗對原住民、農民以及其他共同爭奪同一片土地所有權之相關人士涉有重大影響的案件。雙方辯駁的點聚焦在具爭議性的 Marco Temporal 或稱「時間範圍」的理論上,而這個概念長期被用於授予非巴西原民 (土地) 財產權。它規定,原住民只有在 1988年修憲前佔領的土地才能得到保障。原民團體認為這個想法是一種侮辱 (因他/她們已在南美洲生活了好幾個世紀)… — ✔︎ 按讚【每日一經濟學人】Facebook 粉專:https://reurl.cc/Lddode ✔︎ 追蹤【每日一經濟學人】Instagram 帳號:https://reurl.cc/Oqqoq3 ✔︎ 訂閱【每日一經濟學人】YouTube 頻道:https://reurl.cc/Y665dX ✔︎ 閱讀【每日一經濟學人】Medium 平台:https://reurl.cc/k00WZr — 🔶如有商業合作或業務需求,請洽:leontheeconomist@gmail.com 🔴如影音內容有誤,歡迎來信勘誤:leontheeconomist@gmail.com

0.00 stars, 0 ratings

Or Log In

00:00 / 00:00