LINK ->>> https://byltly.com/2sMMoU
Sri Sankara took the full text of the Sri-Brihad-Aranyaka-Upanishad (of the Black kind) from Sri Govindapadacharya. Next, he showed the Upanishad to his disciples, including Sri Ramanujacharya. The Master, who had recognised Sri Sankara as a realised soul was ecstatic. Sensing Sri Sankara's occult potency, the Saint addressed him as Acharya (teacher). Sri Sankara, in turn, addressed him as Rishi-Vadya, Vyasa who had composed this great work on philosophy. Then another disciple of Sri Sankara, (who was a very learned scholar) said: "You probably meant Rishi-maharishi (great master)". But Sri Sankara replied: "No, I meant Rishi-Vyasa (the great compiler or writer of the Vedas) as this Upanishad is a work on the Upanishads and not on the Vedas". Sri Ramanujacharya who was listening to all this, broke into a loud laugh and said to the others: "Oh well done, you have not heard anything yet." He took the Upanishad and read the adhyayas of it himself. The subtle meaning behind the words caught his attention. It gave him the certainty that he was indeed hearing the sacred words of God himself. He knew he had attained the goal of his long life.Thus the philosophy of Sri Sankara came to be founded on the philosophy of the Upanishads. The Upanishad plays a very important part not only for its ten great sentences but also for the manner in which it is written. Its composed in the poetic way by channelling the thoughts of the great Upanishads author Rishi-Vyasa, the great Vedic composer, into the Vedic language of direct speech. But the original message of the Upanishad is conveyed in a new way. It is conveyed in the terse, person to person way of speaking which conveys the essence of the truth in a way that is original and fresh. The philosophy of Sri Sankara is Vyakarana (philosophy of direct speech). His writing is direct speech of the Upanishad. He eschewed the theories and the commentaries (which are generally full of abstruseness), and he went into the text for its true meaning. He realised that a work of philosophy and its author are inseparable. Once a philosopher begins to philosophise, he is driven into the very essence of the matter to find the truth. Sri Sankara also realised that he had to direct his writing into the Vedic language. The Vedas were composed in the Vedic language at a time when there were no tenses and only the present tense of verbs was used. So Sankara had to find a way of expressing this truth in the present tense of the Vedic language. He did not follow the standard grammar of the Vedas and the grammar of the great grammarians. He had invented a grammar which completely suited the nature of the Upanishad. He had used only the natural grammar and had found his own rhythm in using it. He used colloquial, poetic (that is, full of alliteration) language and if necessary used metaphors and similes to communicate the essence of the Upanishad in the language of direct speech which was his own. This is a great contribution of his to the history of Tamil language.
98329e995e
https://open.firstory.me/story/cldpl8k3e0sls01tjfyk4966t https://open.firstory.me/story/cldpk4ltg0fp001t443ivh1pt https://open.firstory.me/story/cldpla5p10fq401t42bfhfc35 https://open.firstory.me/story/cldpl748t0slq01tj531uet2i https://open.firstory.me/story/cldpkd3070fp801t49zcp44bu